This document describes the Linux Standard Base (LSB) policies and
procedures for the workgroup's development of standards, tests, etc.
Workgroup Structure
| POLICY-01 |
Workgroup Spokespeople |
| Ratified: |
03/20/2002 |
| Approvers: |
George Kraft, Stuart Anderson, Andrew Josey, Kevin Caunt, Chris
Yeoh, Mats Wichmann, Jim Kingdon, Matt Wilson |
The official spokespeople for the LSB workgroup are: the chair and the
team leaders. Others may not represent that they are speaking on behalf of
the LSB without specific prior authorization unless quoting directly from
public materials.
| POLICY-02 |
Specification Authority |
| Ratified: |
03/20/2002 |
| Approvers: |
George Kraft, Stuart Anderson, Andrew Josey, Kevin Caunt, Chris
Yeoh, Mats Wichmann, Jim Kingdon, Matt Wilson |
The SA will be responsible for officially responding to problem reports
raised against the specification and for final resolution of other problem
reports where a proposed resolution will be provided either by the TSMA or
CA. The SA can be contacted at lsb-specauth@freestandards.org
- A two-thirds conference call attending vote is needed in the SA to make
decisions.
- A five business day email notice for voting is required for ballot
items.
- The SA will operate within the procedural and timeline guidelines
outlined by the LSB Workgroup & Certification Policies.
- A preliminary review will be performed by the SA and an initial
response provided via the CA to the applicant within 14 calendar
days.
- A detailed review will be undertaken for issues that are more
complicated or when the preliminary review does not resolve the
issue. Final resolution will be provided within an additional 21
calendar days.
| POLICY-03 |
Test Suite Maintenance Authority |
| Ratified: |
03/20/2002 |
| Approvers: |
George Kraft, Stuart Anderson, Andrew Josey, Kevin Caunt, Chris
Yeoh, Mats Wichmann, Jim Kingdon, Matt Wilson |
The TSMA role is to recommend proposed resolutions to problem reports
raised against the test suite(s). When a problem report arises against a test
suite, the TSMA analyzes it and proposes a resolution that is then passed to
the SA for final resolution.
- A two-thirds conference call attending vote is needed in the TSMA to
make decisions.
- A five business day email notice for voting is required for ballot
items.
- The TSMA will operate within the procedural and timeline guidelines
outlined by the LSB Workgroup & Certification Policies.
| POLICY-04 |
Specification Intellectual Property |
| Ratified: |
06/26/2002 |
| Approvers: |
Stuart Anderson, Doug Beattie, John Cagle, Kevin Caunt, Andrew
Josey, George Kraft, Marvin Heffler, Rusty Lynch, Al Stone, Matt
Taggart, Mats Wichmann, Ted T'so, Ralf Flaxa |
The author of donated documentation or source code may copyright their
original work; however, if the FSG/LSB needs to they can fork and maintain
documentation and code.
| POLICY-05 |
Subject Matter Intellectual Property |
| Ratified: |
06/26/2002 |
| Approvers: |
Stuart Anderson, Doug Beattie, John Cagle, Kevin Caunt, Andrew
Josey, George Kraft, Marvin Heffler, Rusty Lynch, Al Stone, Matt
Taggart, Mats Wichmann, Ted T'so, Ralf Flaxa |
Unencumbered runtime and development for a component and its dependencies.
Consumers and developers must not need to sign a license or pay royalties.
Doing otherwise would hinder the acceptance of the standard.
| POLICY-06 |
Certification Support |
| Ratified: |
21/4/2002 |
| Approvers: |
Workgroup: George Kraft, Stuart Anderson, Mats Wichmann, Kevin
Caunt, Chris Yeoh, Doug Beattie, Andrew Josey, Marvin Heffler |
| Modified: |
18/6/2005 |
| Approvers: |
LSB Steering Committee |
The LSB workgroup will provide support for certification
for the current major release and the previous major release.
| POLICY-07 |
Release Frequency |
| Ratified: |
16/6/2005 |
| Approvers: |
LSB Steering Committee |
LSB Major version releases should occur no more frequently
than 18 months since the previous major version release.
Over time, community feedback has indicated that more
frequent releases are a burden on consumers of the specification
and less frequent releases would risk taking too long to
adapt to new industry best practice.
| POLICY-08 |
ISO Submission of Specifications |
| Ratified: |
16/6/2005 |
| Approvers: |
LSB Steering Committee |
The Steering Committee must approve plans to submit an
LSB specification to ISO as a candidate standard or
an amendment to and existing ISO standard. Considerable
effort is required to carry a specification through the
ISO process, and this needs to be explicitly planned for
in the LSB work calendar. The SC must also determine if
a candidate is sufficiently mature for submission.
|